Dawn’s Bad Haircut
2 years ago
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
One moment, the foobs were in a teal-and-lavender monstrosity of a wedding, and the next they were propelled back into the past. But it was a different version of the past. What happened?
Blog Archive
-
▼
2009
(159)
-
▼
May
(13)
- The wonky proportions are an HOMAGE, I tells ya!
- She's better off hiding in plain sight....
- Reverie
- Repurposing, just like the pros do!
- She shivers in her bones just thinking about the w...
- Malevolent Rubber Duckie
- Or maybe she would just send Mrs. Baird some air
- More revision
- Lawrence's paternity re-re-revisted
- She says "Miggah," he says "Lizardbreath"
- Goggy
- Milborough Scoobies
- Weaker
-
▼
May
(13)
Labels
- Abby (1)
- Anne (11)
- Anthony (4)
- April (22)
- Awareness (22)
- Cameos from other strips (1)
- Characters discussing Pat Josephston (1)
- Characters discussing Yammersons (5)
- Connie (30)
- continuity (6)
- Deanna (8)
- dental practice (1)
- Elly (45)
- Endless coffee (4)
- Farley (2)
- fate (1)
- Fauxley Follows His Schnozz (2)
- Francoise (3)
- Fred or Frank (1)
- Georgia (1)
- Greg (1)
- holidays (2)
- Janice (2)
- Jean (1)
- John (15)
- Lawrence (15)
- Liz (9)
- Meredith (6)
- Michael (26)
- mind games (1)
- Nichols child(ren) (4)
- Pat Josephston (4)
- Peanuts homage (2)
- Phil (14)
- Robin (5)
- shopping (1)
- Steve (2)
- Ted (2)
- Telephone (1)
- Therese (1)
- timeline follies (2)
- WIMP (1)
- writing (11)
- Yammersons (24)
My Blog List
Posts
About Me
Followers
...
8 comments:
Ah....the light dawns. He's starting to figure out why he did some of the crap he did in the first iteration; realizing that Elly is ultimately to blame for the disharmony around her will serve him well after this collapses.
As for the book he's reading, that's pretty funny. "Authorship disputed" indeed.
Ah....the light dawns. He's starting to figure out why he did some of the crap he did in the first iteration; realizing that Elly is ultimately to blame for the disharmony around her will serve him well after this collapses.Time and again, we see her focusing on the wrong things and being oblivious to things that actually matter.
As for the book he's reading, that's pretty funny. "Authorship disputed" indeed.Thanks--I couldn't resist. :)
"Authourship Disputed": sometimes the snark just writes itself, doesn't it?
"Authourship Disputed": sometimes the snark just writes itself, doesn't it?It so does. :)
Just another thought. I do wonder if LynnCo didn't mean m+"ih"+gah, but instead meant m+"eye"+gah (closer to Michael). major fail on translating to plausible phonetic: "Mai-gah" or "Mi-gah" would have made sense.
I do wonder if LynnCo didn't mean m+"ih"+gah, but instead meant m+"eye"+gah (closer to Michael). major fail on translating to plausible phonetic: "Mai-gah" or "Mi-gah" would have made sense.I was actually thinking the exact same thing. This would make more sense for a toddler struggling with the name "Michael." But as you suggest, this is poorly transcribed, with unfortunate results.
You are hitting on all cylinders here. The children's book controversy, Lynn's apparent lack of knowledge about the true "N" word, your ongoing storyline about everyone swept in the past, and even an origin point for "Lizardbreath." It just doesn't get any better.
Thanks, howtheduck. LJ seems to have handed me a silver platter o' snark material this week. I'm tempted to send her a thank-you card. ;)
Post a Comment